Previous Page  58 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

58 E L EC TR I C AL CONNEC T I ON

S PR I NG 20 1 6

THE NEXT PINK BATTS?

T

he manuscript of a new

publication on the 100-year

history of NECA Victoria makes

for interesting reading.

It contains many references to how

our forefathers accessed product and

material, and it solidified thoughts I’ve

had for many years.

Our industry began with electrical

contractors buying and sourcing

material direct from manufacturers

and some ‘appointed’ distributors

throughout the country.

But over time the industry grew. So

did the number of suppliers, and direct

contacts were lost.

Today, the way we source product

is something of a free-for-all, and the

role of the industry wholesaler is being

challenged as never before. However,

there seems to have been a change in

the past two years.

Over the past 10 years there’s been

a substantial increase in contractors

sourcing their own product from

hardware stores or through direct

importation from Asia, made easy by

the internet. NECA research has proved

it. Technologies such as solar have only

increased this trend.

This attempt by contractors to bypass

a step in the established channel has had

added substantially to the risks involved

in running a contracting business.

It opens up the potential for non-

conforming product, financial problems

when dealing with an unknown entity,

warranty issues, product training and

many other pitfalls.

In an attempt to counter direct

purchasing many wholesalers introduced

‘private label’ product under their

own brands. Perhaps this is why some

importers and manufacturers put more

emphasis on marketing directly to

contractors. So it became a ‘chicken and

the egg’ situation.

In any event, contractors seemed

to win in this race to the bottom of the

price curve. Yet after the price bottoms

out the only thing that can move is

the quality.

The established channel via

wholesalers and manufacturers or

importers provides levels of protection

that cannot be argued against.

Some in the industry contend that they

have enough experience to handle the

risks in sourcing product, that they can

control quality and that certification is

correct and will be maintained.

However, the evidence of the past

few years has shown that management

of these issues is difficult even for

wholesalers (who do this for a living), let

alone contractors.

For instance, the entire industry has

made headlines because of faulty cable.

The product in question was not only

sold by non-mainstream wholesalers but

also by a limited number of established

wholesalers. And it was also imported

directly by contractors.

This particular issue is ongoing, and

will be for years.

In another instance NECA research

found that circuit breakers from different

suppliers were stamped with the same

certification approval number. Which one

was correctly tested and approved? How

would a contractor know?

LED lighting has the potential to be

this industry’s ‘pink batt’ moment. The

amount of LED product flooding our

market is phenomenal.

It’s impossible for individual

contractors to manage, test and monitor

each product’s certification. Why would

SUPPOSEDLY CHEAPER

MATERIALS CAN LEAD TO

TECHNOLOGY RISK, WARRANTY

ISSUES AND FINANCIAL

PROBLEMS.

WESMCKNIGHT

POSES THE QUESTION: SHOULD

WE CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE

ESTABLISHED SUPPLY CHANNELS?

MCKNIGHT ON THE TOWN