Previous Page  70 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 70 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

70 E L EC TR I C AL CONNEC T I ON

W I N T E R 20 1 6

REPUTATION IS ALL

M

y involvement in this industry

for more than 30 years has

placed me in the privileged

position of dealing and associating with a

lot of smart people.

And during this time I have observed

the rise and the downfall of many

building companies.

It’s no secret that success in any form

stems from a huge amount of hard

work, sleepless nights, untold stress,

commitment and a lot of personal and

business sacrifices.

Most people start a business because

they want to add value in a void created

by non-caring businesses, and to gain

a reputation that lasts well beyond the

completion of a project. This brings a

sense of worth; to be one of a kind.

Some others start a business in the

hope of making ‘loads’ of money. Well,

we all know what happens with such a

business plan.

Many projects these days are run by

builders, who can be fantastic to work

with. They develop positive partnerships

that enhance the work environment and,

as a result, create good-quality projects

that make the participants proud.

Unfortunately, for the electrician and

other important subcontractors, these

quality builders are in short supply.

Other builders’ objective is to

slash prices and pass on the risk to

subcontractors. If you are desperate for

work, you will take it on as a loss or, if you

are lucky, at cost. Then you pray there will

be some variations.

Do that, and you have forfeited the

main objective of starting your own

business in the first place – no sense

of pride, no added value, no self-worth

and, more important, you are unlikely to

gain a good reputation.

Remember, the builder is there

to ensure that the project complies

with all tender documents – and to

co-ordinate all subcontractors for a

compliant result.

On one project I know of, a mechanical

contractor installed incorrect refrigerant

piping insulation that was inferior to what

was specified (R1.0).

The explanation? The lead time was

too long on the specified insulation so an

executive decision was made to use ‘pair

coil’ (R0.4).

The consultant issued an instruction

to replace all piping insulation with the

specified material.

This second installation was

inspected, only to find that the wrong

insulation had been used yet again.

It didn’t meet the Building Code of

Australia thermal ‘R’ rating.

The explanation this time? “This is what

the supplier sent – which we installed,

assuming it was correct.”

Insulation on piping with a diameter of

12mm or greater then had to be installed

– for the third time.

At the final inspection, the consultant

rejected the larger insulation. It had been

cut with a knife for fitting to the existing

pipe, which was fastened with cable ties.

This meant yet another installation –

the fourth.

The builder, who should have taken an

active role in the rectification, just

passed the liability to the subcontractor,

who must have lost a lot of money by

being foolish.

The builder’s only response was: “We’ll

get it fixed.”

But it wasn’t a matter of ‘we’. The

subcontractor copped all the rectification

cost, additional builder’s cost, delay cost,

etc. Reputation – down the drain!

In another example, an electrical

contractor took on the data

communications component under

a sub-subcontract.

It was confirmed in writing that the

data installation would be carried out by

a vendor-certified installer (CI).

Unbeknown to the builder and the

consultant, the CI walked off the site

claiming that the electrical work was

substandard and the electrical contractor

was not able to support him with the

data installation.

The contractor then proceeded to install

the data cabling, and data outlets were

generally terminated using a pair of pliers.

Despite numerous defect reports,

the contractor maintained that the data

installation was carried out by the CI.

The consultant contacted the CI

about the quality of work and was

given the sorry story. The consultant

then contacted the data equipment

vendor which, after a site visit, said

certification would not be granted.

The site had to undergo complete

rectification to the satisfaction of the

vendor and consultant at huge cost to the

electrical contractor.

This is not the way to run a business. It

is pure madness.

At the very least, if you are working

with a set of drawings and specifications,

never assume that no one will check

your work. When they do, and you’ve

made modifications unacceptable to the

consultant, you are in deep trouble.

More to the point, dropping the price to

win a job could ultimately cost you much

money, aggravation and loss of hair.

It would be ideal if you could choose the

projects and the people to work with, but

that’s not going to happen.

BUSINESS SUCCESS COMES

FROM HIGH SERVICE LEVELS AND

DIFFERENTIATING YOURSELF.

JAN

JINADASA

EXPLAINS.

JAN’S OPUS

BY

JAN

JINADASA