Previous Page  69 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

www. e l e c t r i c a l c o nn e c t i o n . c om . a u

6 9

with

George Georgevits

splitters used for the branching.

Logically, the MoCA network is a bus

topology, just like other types of Ethernet

network.

Connections to Ethernet devices

without a MoCA port (standard wireless

router, Ethernet switch, etc) are made by

connecting to the Ethernet port (typically

10/100Mbps) on a MoCA bridge, in much

the same way as is done with an HFC cable

modem or ADSL modem.

The bridge provides a gateway to other

networks and is simply a MoCA network

device, so a MoCA network can have a

number of bridges.

In the US, the cable service provider

usually provides the bridge to link the

MoCA enabled cable network to the

home owner’s MoCA network. Otherwise,

the cable network simply connects to

the home network via a splitter. This first

splitter is known as the root splitter.

Some minor remedial cabling work may

be required when establishing a MoCA

network. Splitters and sometimes one or

more amplifiers will be embedded in the

existing coax wiring.

These can sometimes cause problems.

Amplifiers and splitters are often only rated

to 1,000MHz (1GHz) or so, because this is

all that is needed for conventional pay TV

signals. MoCA on the other hand requires

bandwidth to 1,650MHz.

If the amplifier or splitter cannot perform

to this higher frequency, it will cause

significant performance degradation on

the MoCA network.

Sometimes there are un-terminated tap

points on splitters that will act as a source of

signal reflections and must be eliminated.

MOCA ADVANTAGES

The main advantage of a MoCA network

is that it uses existing cabling to provide

high-speed data communications to all

access points.

It also offers the reliability and security of

a cable-based network.

A MoCA network doesn’t have to be

connected to the internet. Its prime

function is to provide high-speed point-

to-point connectivity within the home. It

can work independently as a stand-alone

network and still provide this connectivity.

For file transfers within your home

that do not require internet involvement,

MoCA offers a very satisfactory high-

speed data service.

However, once you connect to a network

outside your home things can change.

One of the claimed advantages of MoCA

is that there are no delays associated

with transferring streaming content, as

can sometimes occur with internet TV or

internet-based HD video downloads (such

as movies).

This may be true if you are using MoCA

in the US, where a pay TV operator is

providing you with the content. However, it

is not the case in Australia when streaming

content accessed via the internet.

In Australia, pay TV companies do not

provide a MoCA compatible service, so the

only way to access streaming content is via

the internet.

When you watch internet TV, HD movies

or some other form of streaming HD

content in real time in Australia, you access

it via ADSL, HFC cable or whatever internet

access technology you have signed up for

with your ISP.

Regardless of the technology, it will

suffer from latency problems caused by

the limited bandwidth of your service and

the traffic-handling capabilities of your ISP’s

equipment. The internet infrastructure in

general can also be a problem, particularly

at times of peak traffic.

In short, you will sometimes experience

frame freeze and buffering delays,

regardless of whether your home network

is MoCA based.

Another of MoCA’s claims is that it

is reliable. This is probably true, if the

performance is compared with that of a

wireless network. However, it is certainly

no more reliable than the competing

technology, namely Gigabit Ethernet over

Category 5e twisted pair.

DISADVANTAGES IN AUSTRALIA

MoCA seems to be gaining acceptance

in the US, where a number of pay TV

operators are providing MoCA based

services.

The equipment is also available in the

UK, but support is said to be poor. The

technology is unheard of in Australia.

The reason (apart from incompatibility

with Australian HFC services) is that using

MoCA becomes cost effective only when

there already is a coax point in every room

of your home, or at least in every room

where you require network access.

Unlike US dwellings, Australian homes

are generally not wired throughout with

coax for access to cable TV. Most houses

have only one or two points, and MoCA

is not cost effective if the wiring needs to

be radically altered. Also, MoCA enabled

devices are not cheap, even in the US.

MoCA 2.0 is touted as being fast and

secure. Well, a Cat 5e cabled Gigabit

Ethernet network will support a 1Gbps

data rate to every port and is every bit as

secure as a MoCA network.

Furthermore, twisted-pair Ethernet is

not limited to 16 devices or to a maximum

span distance of 85m. Gigabit Ethernet

over Cat 5e cabling has a maximum link

length of 100m, so if the hub is centrally

located, it can reach ports up to 200m

apart. The distance limit can be pushed

even further if you use Cat 6 cabling.

Ethernet hardware is cheap and not

restricted to a few select suppliers. Most

entertainment devices these days are

equipped with at least one Ethernet port.

CONCLUSION

Although MoCA seems to be a

good idea at first glance, it is not suited

to the Australian environment for the

reasons outlined.