Boards, directors must get ‘hands on’ to avoid falling foul of new industrial manslaughter laws
SAI Global has warned that delegating accountability for workplace safety will not be sufficient defence for board members and C-Suite executives under new industrial manslaughter laws across Australia.
It says that company directors must be actively and directly involved in the establishment and review of, and training around, workplace safety systems, to reduce their risk of personal liability and prosecution in case of a workplace fatality. The most effective method of ensuring compliance with the new laws is certification to the latest international occupational health and safety standard.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Industrial manslaughter laws legislated in Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, the Northern Territory and the ACT place legal liability squarely at the feet of the C-suite and company directors for industrial manslaughter,” SAI Global workplace safety expert Kiran Bhagat says.
“Organisations must ensure their compliance to OHS laws is over and above current standards and, besides, aim to meet and exceed international standards as a safeguard. The highest-ranking leaders in an organisation must be proactively involved in these processes.”
The penalties under the new laws are unprecedented:
- In Victoria, it is a maximum of 25 years’ imprisonment for individuals and a staggering maximum fine of $16.5 million for companies.
- In the Northern Territory penalties could be life imprisonment and fines up to $10.075 million.
- In Western Australia, the maximum penalty is up to 20 years’ imprisonment for individuals and fines of up to $10 million for companies.
- The ACT was the first State to enact an industrial manslaughter law, with penalties currently sitting at $1.62 million for a body corporate or $320,000 for an individual, or 20 years’ imprisonment (or both).
- In Queensland, directors could face up to 20 years’ imprisonment, and organisations could receive fines exceeding $10 million.
“It is no longer acceptable for company directors to delegate workplace safety, or pass the blame, to management representatives,” Kiran explains.
“As the most senior figureheads of an organisation, they are accountable for the actions of their employees, and the penalties stand to have a profound personal impact on their lives. It is the reason why certification to ISO 45001 – the latest international standard to which thousands of organisations are certified – is the most effective approach to complying with the requirements of the new industrial manslaughter laws.
He adds that under the law and standard, business leaders must be directly involved, take a preventative approach and ensure involvement from workers and contractors.
It emphasises that everyone must have a voice: “OHS must become a part of an organisation’s management commitments. Agenda items in management and board meeting should include a review of OHS procedures, accidents and near-misses, directive actions such as training to mitigate risks, creating opportunities for a safer workplace and documentation requirements. Directors and board members must also be involved in training,” he says.
So far, in 2020, there have been 147 deaths of workers on the jobs. Already the first cases of negligence under State-based industrial manslaughter legislation are being prosecuted, with a West Australian company director facing charges of gross negligence and possible jail time after the third serious breach of the Workplace Health and Safety (WHS) Act since 2013.
“If the appropriate stakeholders in a business understand, promote and implement robust workplace safety systems and ensure they undertake specialised training, they could make a real impact to reducing the risk of workplace accidents, injuries or fatalities,” Kiran concludes.
-
ADVERTISEMENT
-
ADVERTISEMENT